Here again the proposed text:
first
In youth pornography, is understood in contrast to child pornography and other pornography concept, just (a) the production of the sexual act in the strict sense and (b) the production of masturbation as a concrete action.
also counts for Youth pornography under the law a (c) undetermined form of posing and (d) the alleged sham youthfulness.
(a) The production of the sex in the narrowest sense, it requires vaginal, oral or anal penetration (Imissio).
(b) Masturbation as a concrete action is touching the sexual organ in the strict sense (penis, vagina, clitoris) operating systems. Other masturbation related events as well as the representation of the male erection are not as concrete action.
(c) Youth Pornographic Posing is only when on private parts zoomed without overall presentation of the body or if it vagina or anus to open and be aware of distortion (so-called "Pink" images).
(d) Because of the associated appearance of a supposedly allowed child pornography productions as Family pornographic if they establish a child's environment is shown ("Schulmädelsex") or a child's or young age is claimed (age lie).
second
Literary youth pornography and representations of the visual arts are basically free. Excluded are fitted with electronic Aids produced realistic drawing and painting techniques, in particular the so-called "Poser Art".
third
the property - but not the distribution - so-called "patina" youth pornography is free. Patina youth pornography is always be the case if its origin established before the entry into force of the law or can be made sufficiently credible. The burden of proof lies with the owner.
These are some explanations :
We get so blurred the large area of only erotic and pornographic cross representations from the table.
item is in the infancy stage, a rigorous interpretation of the concept of pornography quite out of place, it can be in the youth pornography back off without damage.
It is in my proposal for a definition that every photographer had to change before the 1970 world familiar: pornography, which may not be represented, was once the concrete implementation of the Act, on the other "Pink". The Pink-term, the opening of the female member, was then extended depending on the country to ban the image of the pubic hair (always curious here, Japan) or widespread, the labia at all. Great Britain took many years, a line which, although pubis and the outer shape of the labia allowed to photograph, but not allowed a recognition of the slot. As a result, we know all the cabinets with staples series and books of the nude, in which British sewn nude models strange and have seamlessly welded structures between the legs. -
took a special passion for the federal government and the people waiting - early - Federal Department of the penis, in particular, they struggled to the permitted erection angle. 45 degrees might go. Oswald Kolle then provided with a start-up assistance to the Federal Minister of Dia and enjoyable 90 degrees.
behind my proposal the delimitation of the concept of youth to pornography pornography in the strictest sense are primarily considerations regarding the protection idea. The representation of erotic acts, or even the simple naked body is on young people today no longer as consistently modestly busy, as one might assume. The youthful erection is no longer a serious taboo.
We have trouble imagining shapely young people who grieve immediately or in later years to death, because - even slightly eroticized - nudes of them are in the network. situation is different with Pictures and movies in which the juvenile is represented in the enforcement of the sexual .
protection purposes here, several are injured. Once other young people can be suggested that, in a nearby concrete Sexvollzug prostitution is, of course. About this argument, which amounts to the idea of "look" can be contentious. This also applies to the alleged time and again, in the praxis of life but rarely substantiated claim that participation of young people in porn studios, etc. could lead to prostitution and be with her closely.
take very seriously, however, the protection of W ü rde of Young people and the suspicion that he was aware of the consequences of his actions - not the enforcement of the Act itself, but its ffentlichmachung Ö - not consciously.
We must protect young people against an action which may regret it now or later.
This also includes the obvious argument that as a model for other young people is dangerous, it shall be held a certain inducing young people to represent sexual acts on video or on the net. It is probably true that with skillful and consistent use of the existing laws have also been such an event would largely be prevented. But a clear signal to young people, their specific sexual acts not to be present to achieve a full mental age development in the network or the video shelf, can only be welcomed.
The usual counter-arguments such as the self-determination of youth about their bodies or the inevitable ubiquity of global representations in the network change nothing about the fact that we can protect young people in particular from indiscriminate violations of their own dignity and should be.
addition to the containment of pornography on the actual act and the regulations to posing appearance and youthfulness to their core ü ü ckgef to be carried in order to remain an appropriate and feasible.
Posing had imposed originally, as had in the field of youth nude photography two prominent videographers and photographers began to Hungarian sites on Lake Balaton and on the Australian coast, offering young girls "in" the vulva and boys in the Analspalt to . zoom I had emerged as the first of its kind in two German youth nudist magazines, turning even a warning to the publishers. The painful, impossible these recordings had become clear that not only very young but mature girl has have been photographed and filmed, but now also, and above all immature little boy and my girl completely undeveloped small to small children. Zooming was the beginning of unsound way, who kept his eyes open, had to notice that. The further development is well known.
Linked to this is the concept of the "Pink", closely associated with the photography in "Hustler" - notabene only in the U.S. version of this magazine with a circulation of millions, not in German. The strong absorption of the inner lips of a model, even without a close-up, a major taboo in the minds of the woman herself, he should not be permitted explicitly in the youth erotic photography. But otherwise he's notion of "posing" unhappy.
over the erection of the young man there are all sorts of misunderstandings. It is no longer seen as a disgrace, who experienced rupture of an intimate talks with pride about it about the balance. I advise you not to Adenauer-angle return, but erections from today's perspective, not classified as adult pornographic.
misunderstandings also exist in the "Poser Art" and other electronic means (partially) generated forms of representation, but now in the other direction: they are underestimated. suggestive power and perfect image effect is already true Representations sometimes superior . It would not prohibit the blue-eyed youth, and I am of course only to the proper representation of the actual act in the strictest sense, or to the Schulmächen-appearance or to the posing in the sense of the intimate opening.
(All the other points of my proposal later)
0 comments:
Post a Comment