What do a drill for 20 € and a pork chop for 2 € common? Well, they work. Meaning, of course, the drill drill the desired hole, surely the desired holes. Only she does it just not for long, and never on a sound basis.
The pork sizzles as usual on the grill or in the pan and makes - served as a sweet little medallions - not least the children happy. Prima. Mom has the Young again supplied and dad finally mounted the mirror in the bathroom. Where now is the problem?
The problem is the consequences of our actions. I was out on Friday afternoon a short discussion on supply and demand, in which I defended the thesis / conviction until the demand creates supply. But I must first define my understanding of the concept of demand. In demand, I understand - like the end of a instinctive action in behavioral biology - the interaction of several factors, that directly at the tip stationary factor (the direct purchase requirement, and the direct desire to possess something) like a marine floating iceberg only a few percent of the whole accounts. It sounds really sexy here: click .
I was held against, including the existence of dictators, and (in the FR was the pope in a comment recently referred to as such) to justify potentates. Well, why not? Quite consistently, and only thought before his own door had seen: The Peaceful Revolution came from the people that lock up and no longer wanted to patronize. With the Monday prayers in Leipzig's Nikolai Church was a voluntary process initiated by the people (with the pastor and leader of his house a focal point) in motion, the end just a mass murder or the case could mark the wall. Other nations will need external help, cry for decades afterwards. What drowns out their voices? Among others, the ringing (or rather the contents) of your probably located just within reach mobile phone, dear reader.
And the emergence of the GDR? Times of great uncertainty and instability - as they prevailed even after the end of World War II - mixed situations are dangerous. The clash of two value systems, which lead to the following decades in the Cold War should be made - yes, even to prevent even more millions of victims - Germany divided into two parts. The will of the people was there before the outside - because there were no people in the modern sense anymore. It was only the desire to hold on to something, a fixed point to get.
got one half of Germany with the economic boom years, finally she quickly inquired: growth and prosperity. The other half of Germany was used as a storage warehouse for people and the - both in resource and environmental aspects viewed - exploitation. The rest is history. The laundry is now clean again. The lungs? I have no idea.
Many factors, a visual predator. This scheme can be well on the current debate about dioxin in chicken eggs and then apply even in the pork. Anyone whose brain is not destroyed by BSE, is the precipitating cause of the scandal at that time (at least, this scenario was as surprising Remember perceived): Shredded sheep were used as cattle feed. MBM could not be further fed and as a gift for that swallowed chunks of got the meat industry at EU level, the permission to trade with their waste as a consequence. The next scandal was inevitable. He should call later rotten meat scandal.
But what is left to the peasants? You must survive, and are at the mercy of the big discounters. Further provides that the amount of EU agricultural subsidies remain on that area and the livestock from the hotel. Organic animal feed production, environmental protection, consumer (as I love that word!) Enlightenment later. Production takes place on Earth, quickly and cheaply. Industrial fats are cheap, the QA system only obliged to self-regulation, the customer buys the products, the hamster wheel spinning.
animal rights activists are now trying, with a display in response to the EU target - creating a precedent - to cull all animals contaminated with dioxin. There still is § 17 of the Animal Welfare Act actually not for farm animals. But it is a rational reason to fatten a pig quickly and then kill the 2 €-steak?
I approach the punctum saliens. What is reasonable? What we're doing now really, how is the review fail in 50 years?
0 comments:
Post a Comment